On the important issue of copycat companies

February 3, 2010 – 3:34 pm

Looking through my twitter stream, I came across this from Bryce:











It’s not just him.  It’s reality.

And as the founder of one of the world’s most successful knockoff companies, I really can’t think of anything wrong with it.

In fact, there are a lot of things RIGHT with knockoffs on the startup scene:

  1. Ideas aren’t worth much on their own.  In fact, I’ll prove it to you right now.  I have an idea!  It’s amazing.  Instead of shipping goods or people across the country in airplanes, my idea is a product that would get them there in 3-4 seconds using advanced optic teleportation technology.  3-4 seconds to be ANYWHERE!   Now….how much will you pay me for this IDEA?

  2. Weed out the weak hands in both entrepreneurship and startup-investing. You have a unique idea.  You determine the timing of taking it to market.  You determine the marketing, PR and other promotional aspects of the business.  You get a head start on everyone that could ever copy you.  Now….with all of those “original idea” advantages, if I can get my version 1 out before you react to customers and get your version 2 out……if I can move quickly enough to get YOUR idea executed and in the hands of more people swiftly…..why the hell shouldn’t I win?   VC’s and angels investing in “feature ideas” instead of “business teams” will also get what they deserve.   EVERYTHING counts.  Just because you’re first to market with an idea doesn’t mean you don’t have to distribute, brand, support etc!

  3. Revenues matter. The things that make “features” so tempting to build are the exact same things that make them so easy to copy.  Cheap to build, fast to market, all that low-barrier stuff.  But revenues…that really changes the game.  Revenues are a mirror of end-user value.  To build a product or service that people or companies are willing to pay for is not easy.  It’s even less easy to copy, because those initial customers are much less likely to switch to a copycat.  Think of it this way:  Are you more likely to try another free photo-sharing site, or try another brokerage?

  4. It’s the way it is, damn it! Trying to fight copycats is ignorant.  What….was Google the first search engine, or did they COPYCAT Altavista…or AOL….or Yahoo?   Did Henry Ford owe it to Ferdinand Verbiest not to produce the Model T in massive quantities?  Of course not.  Competition (the absence of a monopoly on the execution of an IDEA) is what makes the world a better place, and yet it does not exist for the most savvy of entrepreneurs.  Put that in your pipe and smoke it, chief.

In summary:  Yes, there will be more and more fast knockoffs as more and more “originators” are simply features with low barriers to entry.  Originators still have a major advantage and are still a great investment if there is a business and team that EXECUTES behind the idea.  If not, then the copycat that has those parts deserves to win.

So don’t worry about copycats.  ASSUME they are already there on day one.  Beat them before they can even get started.  Build your own barriers and keep innovating, keep growing the gap between yourself and the parrots.

Oh, and if you see someone with a great idea that you can “knock off” and beat…..DO IT.  This is business, not show-and-tell.

Win.

  • Like the famous football adage, winning at startups is becoming 'a game of inches'. An incremental improvement can result in a big edge over the competition. A popular example being the difference between having the #1 and #5 ranking in Google.

    I've just noticed you have the best commenters of any blog I've seen. Thanks for your active replying!
  • I'll take 2nd to avc.com :)

    Sent from my Millennium Falcon
  • You're one of the commenters at AVC.com, so you deserve some of the credit too. Especially for that one about global warming a couple of weeks ago.

    BTW, speaking of new ideas and new businesses, did you see the e-mail I sent you about one a couple of weeks ago? I sent it on 1/21 and the subject line was "Winning in 2010".
  • Just once I would like to see a VC acknowledge the law of supply and demand when it comes to ideas. If ideas are cheap, it could be because supply is cheap OR it could be because there is no demand.

    And why would anybody put money into pre-venture capital financeable ideas? There is no company big enough to compete with universities and the federal government in financing that work.

    Please put a little more thought into this and repost.
  • Everyone and their uncle has a dozen ideas for a business in a lifetime.
    It's safe to assume that ideas are cheap because they are in abundance.

    I put money into "pre-venture capital financeable ideas" [sic] all the time,
    because I believe that the PEOPLE I am investing in will execute on those
    ideas and return a profit. It's quite simple, really.
  • 1 is a straw man. Nobody in their right mind is going to argue that ideas that violate physics are worth something.

    Consider the time and money that would be saved if multiple startups weren't competing pre- or post-funding nationwide. What the same people knew about each other and started differentiating from the beginning?

    Now tell me how we can make that happen without requiring these people to file information about their ideas in a central repository, indexed, and publicly available -- i.e., a patent office.

    Lousy reasoning, lousy conclusion. Good business is not about "knocking off" ideas from smaller or weaker people. It's about a harmony of ideas and action, which results in a performance that others cannot imitate.
  • Consider the amount of IMPROVEMENT and INNOVATION that would be missed if
    multiple startups weren't attacking the same problem. If we relied purely
    on the original idea-holder to execute his plan.

    Or maybe you would enjoy car shopping more with one truck (version 36.1!),
    one minivan, one sedan and one motorcycle as your choices?

    Lousy comment.
  • I've got this idea for a faux business model that at first seems really amazing, but after 5 years and millions of invested dollars wasted, it turns out to be a dud. The copycat roach motel :)
  • I'm in!!!
  • "Instead of shipping goods or people across the country in airplanes, my idea is a product that would get them there in 3-4 seconds using advanced optic teleportation technology. 3-4 seconds to be ANYWHERE!"

    Sacha Baron Cohen pitched an idea like that to a New York venture capitalist on his Da Ali G Show on HBO once. He brought in a skateboard without the wheels and pitched the VC an idea for a flying skateboard.

    The V.C.: "How do you get it to fly?"

    Cohen: "That's where you come in."
  • Awesome Dave ;)
  • Classic....youtube?
  • The skateboard pitch starts at about 3:45 of this clip.
  • I love the knock off that are 80/20 companies - 80% of the solution for 20% of the price, like gotomeeting compared to webex. I don't need the 20% that webex offers - which btw, makes it more complex and harder to use
  • Good point
  • Awesome. Love it.
  • stringsn88keys
    I'd like to see ideas belong to those with the clarity of vision and the passion to execute--including 90% of those that are in the hands of patent holders.
  • Oh don't get me started on those patent shops.... i.e. lawyers with
    paperwork and no passion. Ugh
blog comments powered by Disqus